ELTON rates each vulnerability in isolation, then lets the dependency graph decide what is actually exploitable. Dynamically differentiating between an exploitable vulnerability and an internal weakness. Entry vectors produce conditions. Findings require them.
This is a live illustrative model of one device release. Direct nodes are exploitable on their own. Conditional nodes are reachable only when an upstream finding produces the condition they require. Weaknesses have no path on this device, and ship dismissed with their reasoning.
CVSSv4 introduced subsequent-system impact for a reason: real attacks chain. A low-severity information leak plus a reachable authentication bypass plus a memory-safety bug is not three medium problems. It is one critical path. ELTON models the whole path, scores the chain, and tells your developers which single root fix breaks the most.
ELTON maps each device's unique initial access points and traces exploit chains across components, interfaces, and trust boundaries to find realistic paths.
ELTON automates CVSSv4 subsequent impact by modeling trust relationships to determine what else falls if a component is fully compromised.
See whether fixing one vulnerability reduces the severity of the rest, before you ship the mitigation.
Start with one device. We build the twin from documentation your quality system already produces, run AI discovery remotely, and show you the graph: the handful to fix, and the evidence for everything else.